Web29 mar 2024 · Assuming that you appended the manually added libraries to the bottom of the file, PHITS would use the JENDL-4.0 (.50c) library. If you want/have to use .80c I would add lib(2) = 80c to the [Parameter] section, that tells PHITS that it should use nuclear data libraries ending with .80c by default for neutrons. Web1 apr 2014 · Abstract. The author has been able to process ENDF/B-VII.1 using NJOY.99 to produce groupwise data and run a significant number of benchmark cases without issue. Two validation metrics have been calculated to aid comparison of the ENDF/B-VII.1 data with its predecessor ENDF/B-VII.0 and JENDL-4.0. All three datasets show good …
Present Status of the JENDL Project 2011 - Nuclear Energy Agency …
WebJENDL-4.0 adopted mt12-15 mt3 data including the capture reaction for a lot of nuclei, where the kinematics KERMA and DPA data have the same problem as that in nuclei without secondary gamma data (JENDL-4.0 and FENDL-3.1b in Fig. 10 are not correct. The difference between ENDF/B-VII.1 WebThe new library was released as JENDL-4.0, and the data can be retrieved from the Web site of the JAEA Nuclear Data Center. KEYWORDS: JENDL-4.0 nuclear data evaluation … pay us federal income tax
Monte Carlo analysis of KRITZ-2 critical benchmarks on the …
WebJENDL-4.0 High-Energy File (JENDL-4.0/HE) [3], was released in 2015. It includes evaluated cross-sections for incident neutrons and protons up to 200 MeV for 130 and 133 nuclei, respectively. Substantial features of the JENDL-4.0/HE are, (1) systematic evaluation for medium-mass nuclei using the CCONE code [4] with Web1 dic 2012 · The results for ENDF/B-VII.1 and JEFF-3.1.1 are more the 5000 pcm below the benchmark value, whereas the results for JENDL-4.0 are within the benchmark uncertainty range. There are two main possibilities why the performance of the libraries is so different for this benchmark case, whereas for the others the performance is similar. Webwhile those with JENDL-4.0/HE are smaller by ~ 40 % and ~ 20 % at maximum than those with FENDL-3.1b and JENDL-HE/2007, respectively. 3.5 Problems of 56Fe data in JENDL-4.0/HE In order to specify reasons for the larger underestimation of the calculation result with JENDL-4.0 in the iron experiment with 65 MeV neutrons, the cross section data pay us foods with credit card