Chaffin v. brame
WebCase Brief. Case Name: Chaffin v. Brame. Court and Date: 1951. Procedural History: The trial court in Lincoln County (North Carolina) entered the jury’s verdict that the Plaintiff was. … WebIn Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276, where the plaintiff collided with the rear of an unlighted truck parked on the highway at night, the court stated: "The duty of the nocturnal motorist to exercise ordinary care for his own safety does not extend so far as to require that he must be able to bring his automobile to an immediate ...
Chaffin v. brame
Did you know?
WebJan 15, 1999 · Read Acree v. Hartford South Inc., 724 So. 2d 183, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database ... See Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276, 64 S.E.2d 276, 279 (N.C. 1951). Santiago did not see the two pedestrians nor do we think he was duty-bound to have seen them under the circumstances of this … WebChaffin v. Brame (1951) If the plaintiff exercises ordinary care by reducing the speed of his car and proceeding with extreme caution after being briefly blinded by the high beams of an oncoming car, then he is not contributorily negligent for hitting the defendant's car, which blocked the right lane and virtually blended with the darkness of ...
WebChaffin v. Brame One year after Marshall v. Southern, in the same court, state and same facts. Held P was NOT neg as a matter of law. ISSUE: As a matter of law, is a person negligent for driving an automobile in the dark at such a speed that he or she is unable to stop within the range of the automobile's headlights?
WebThis Court said in Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276: ... Brame, supra; Williams v. Express Lines, 198 N.C. 193, 151 S.E. 197. The trial court properly overruled defendants' motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit and correctly submitted the case to … WebChaffin v. Brame is the most recent of a number of cases that involve an after-dark collision of an automobile with a parked vehicle or some other stationary object.3 The rule of …
WebThe plaintiff made out this case: At 9 P.M. on March 8, 1950, plaintiff was driving his Ford car southward on Route 18, a paved highway 18 feet wide, in Wilkes County, North …
WebChaffin v. Brame (Reversed Marshall v. Southern Railway Co.) Issue: Whether a judge can create a specific standard/duty of care Yes. Rule: it is an issue for the judge to decide the Duty and Breach in a negligence per se case. Martin … england rugby team 1970WebUpLaw is an online law library providing the resources and tools necessary to represent your legal rights. dreams overWebLimones v. School District of Lee County ..... 126 Note: Assessing the Language of Foreseeability and Risk ..... 128 C. Unstructured Weighing of Risks and Costs..... 129 Indiana Consolidated Insurance Co. v. Mathew ..... 129 Stinnett v. england rugby team 1983WebChaffin v. Brame, 64 S.E.2d 276 (N.C. 1951) Supreme Court of North Carolina Filed: March 28th, 1951 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 64 S.E.2d 276, 233 N.C. 377 … dream spa and massage little rockWebPage 276. 64 S.E.2d 276 233 N.C. 377 CHAFFIN, v. BRAME. No. 308 Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 28, 1951. M. T. Leatherman, C. E. Leatherman, Lincolnton, and J ... dream southWebChaffin v. Brame is the most recent of a number of cases that involve an after-dark collision of an automobile with a parked vehicle or some other stationary object.3 The rule of … dream space 1hrWebChaffin v. Brame - 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276 (1951) Rule: The duty of a nocturnal motorist to exercise ordinary care for his own safety does not extend so far as to require … dream spa and salon westport